Pedicure: To Fish Or Not To Fish?

3 Comments

Today, we are really proud to feature a blog post from London-based French journalist Raphaele Kranjcevic who has been testing Fish Therapy for Mindbubble.

Fish therapy is THE new upcoming pedicure trend that has been recently expanding through Europe. This far-fetched beauty treatment was developed in Asia and has since proved to be really efficient and seductive.

The concept is simple: plunge your feet into a plastic box full of Garra Rufa fish, and let them do the hard work.They will suck your feet, and nibble the dead skin away to give you the smoothest feet you’ve ever had.

The result is surprising: you feel relaxed, and your feet are soft and revitalised. Although it might sound a bit scary to have your feet ‘eaten’ by fish, the sensation is really pleasant.

You might feel nervous or sceptical right before you put your feet in the water – especially when you see them rising to the surface, full of excitement at the sight of food. The first seconds tickle a bit, but then it becomes really relaxing and enjoyable.

And don’t worry about the fish – they actually love it. The Garra Rufa fish, also called the ‘reddish log sucker’ or ‘Doctor Fish’, can be found in the hot springs of Kangal in Turkey.

They are best known for having the secret of skin regeneration, thanks to their active enzyme called diathanol. Having no teeth, the fish feed themselves by nibbling the dead skin, leaving the healthy skin to grow.

This method is not only used for feet beautification, it is also medically recognised as a cure against skin conditions such as psoriasis and eczema.

In these cases, the treatment is longer and more intense: the patient needs to be completely immersed in the water and renew the sessions every week. But in the long term, it efficiently reduces the skin damage.

Fish therapy is a fun way to take care of your feet, especially during winter when your feet are more sensitive to the cold and wet weather. The sessions are quick – between 15 and 30 minutes – and the price is affordable – between £8 and £30 for 15 minutes. It is also something you can do with your friends, and don’t worry you can keep your clothes on!

Places you can experience fish therapy for yourself:

Aqua Sheko – 14 Holland Street, High Street Kensington, London, W8 4LT

Zoola Fish – Camden Lock Village, London

Appy Feet Derby – Westfield Derby, Derby, DE1 2PQ

Appy Feet Manchester – The Trafford Centre, Manchester, M17 8AA

Appy Feet Sheffield – Meadowhall Shopping Centre (lower level), Sheffield, S9 1EP

Raphaele for Mindbubble

Project Einstein – Apply Now!

0 Comments

Do you consume certain foods and drinks to improve your brain health? Some people think avocados make you clever, some swear by omega-3 – what’s your secret?

You could earn £70 by taking part in a 10 day online community all about brain health? We are looking for people from all over the uk to take part in this interesting project.

If you are aged 25 – 60 years old then you could take part in this project.

If you would like to be considered for this community please  complete our short form below and submit your details. We will be taking applications until 12pm Thursday 11th November, so don’t delay!!

Are Peta Ads Sexy or Sexist?

0 Comments

When it comes to advertising, we all know that sex sells.

But what happens when this advertising tactic exploits women, and the ‘product’ your trying to ’sell’ is ‘People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals’?

This is a question which has surrounded PETA many times, especially in response to their ads which are increasingly being branded as ’sexist.’

The latest PETA controversy came up with their new ‘All Animals Have the Same Parts’ ad, featuring spokesperson Pamela Anderson as a piece of meat.

And no, I don’t mean that figuratively, as in they’re sexualising her as if she were ‘just a piece of meat.’ Pamela Anderson is literally portrayed with her body sectioned off in to a collection of cuts of meat.

Hmm… I wonder why anyone would interpret that as being a sexist ad?

In response to the ad, (which was banned in Canada) Senior Vice President Dan Matthews stated: “I think that city officials are looking at this lovely ad and confusing ’sexy’ with ’sexist.’”

This is coming from the same organisation who also acknowledges the link between animal abuse to abuse against women, with studies on their website which include: “According to New South Wales newspaper, a police study in Australia revealed that ‘100 percent of sexual homicide offenders examined had a history of animal cruelty.’”

So if I’m getting this right, PETA wants to try to fight animal cruelty (which can be closely linked to crimes against women) with images that promote crimes against women…?

And this is not the first time PETA has come up with an ad that many found to be offensive against women.

Other examples include the billboard: ‘Save the Whales. Lose the Blubber: Go Vegetarian,’ or the Peta commercial which was banned from the Super Bowl, which showed a man beating a woman to death in the street with a baseball bat.

PETA is also well-known for choosing famous porn stars (Jenna Jameson, for example) as their spokespeople, which Carol J. Adams (animal rights activist, feminist and author) criticizes, stating: ‘People say ’sex sells.’ I say sex sells sex. Peta conflates sexualisation and animal exploitation and this harms animals.’

There is one thing which PETA ads are good at, however, and that’s getting your attention. Just the fact that PETA ads have been at the center of many controversies proves this fact…

What do you think of the shock tactics used in PETA ads: successful marketing strategy or sexist against women?

Communities & Campaigns: Brand Savvy or Brand Sheep?

1 Comment

I discovered Levi’s ‘Shape What’s To Come‘ community recently, and immediately loved the concept behind it.

It’s a massive online community they’ve formed to encourage women to collaborate with and mentor each other ‘based around shared interests and passions, regardless of age or location’ – which isn’t uncommon (Mindbubble shares this sense of community) but what I find interesting is that although it’s from Levi’s, it’s as cleverley unbranded as possible; all designed to very subtley promote their new ‘Curve ID’ jeans – which apparently are all about shape not size, and the perfect fitting jeans.

It then made me start thinking about the subject of brand loyalty, fanboyism, whatever you like to call it, and the way brands are increasingly using this sort of campaign to encourage this loyalty.

This is especially important in times of a recession, when spending on ‘Luxury’ items like jeans tend to decrease over necessary purchases.

So is this a good or a bad thing?

On the one hand, it’s a shameless guise to get lots of women involved, get them feeling good about Levi’s, that will ultimately create brand loyalty and make them believe that Levi’s are better than every other jeans brand out there.

Especially if they become a heavy user of the community, and these connections and networks do have a positive impact on their ambitions and careers.

On the other hand, regardless of the commercialism behind the idea, no one can deny that global collaborative networks that encourage women to challenge themselves and follow their dreams and ambitions is a brilliant thing and many of us need that support network to make our dreams reality.

If it means we’ll buy Levi’s instead of Diesel, for example – well, we’re cleverer than that, surely?

Another example is the truly massive Cadbury’s Spots & Stripes campaign, centered ultimately on the 2012 olympics, tapping into the nation’s collective competitiveness, and engaging with the public on a much deeper level by getting them to choose ’sides’.

It creates discussion points about the campaign and brand at grass roots level – everything from challenge chocolate bars, to tweet-offs, to the games played in real life then posted online. I’m a bit of a fan of this one – it’s a great way of engaging the public with the Olympics and ultimately – with Cadbury’s.

Another interesting one is the Nike Grid – which encourages you to ‘run your postcode’ (if you have a central London one) you run through it, calling in at phone box checkpoints along the way, each run gets you 10 points.

Score the most points in a postcode to own it.

But you don’t just have to run solo, you can play for a team.

Again, creating this sense of community and fun, from a brand.

This is also cleverly tapping into the trend for people quitting their gyms because of the recession – “for many people, a run in the park may represent better value in the current economic (if not actual) climate.” (Irish Times)

Getting fitter, playing a game, and ultimately feeling part of something – is again all forming this brand loyalty and will ultimately mean you are more likely to buy into Nike than any other.

Brands openly encourage this competitiveness between customers – it’s the whole PC vc Mac thing.

It’s all down to psychology – you are defined, as a person, by the brands you buy, even if you don’t realise it, or don’t want to be.

You justify past purchases that you made because they were the best value/most up to date product that was out there, when in reality, it was because it fitted in with your self image:

“If you have to rationalize why you bought a luxury item, you will probably find ways to see how it fits in with your self-image.

Branding builds on this by giving you the option to create the person you think you are through choosing to align yourself with the mystique of certain products.” (From Youarenotsosmart.com )

So what do you think of all this?

Would you join ‘Shape what’s to come’ or the Nike Grid – because of, or in spite of, their brand affiliations? I’m really interested to know what you think!

Survey: Which Magazines Do You Read?

0 Comments


China Whispers: The foolhardy diary of a trek along the Great Wall of China- Episode 2

0 Comments


Our Chinese experience-of-a-lifetime started with an acclimatisation day in Beijing.

Whisked from the airport in a lovely, air-conditioned coach, we plunged straight into a tour of the city.

Jetlag be damned!

Our tour included such attractions as the National Museum of China and Tiananmen Square, where our guide joked that we shouldn’t mention revolutions, students or tanks.

Um, OK then.

Actually, despite a lingering air of suspicion around the entrance to the Forbidden City, most of what we saw of Beijing that day was strangely similar to Western tourist cities.

People drank coffees from Styrofoam cups and the ever-present trinket sellers were out in force.

We even did what loads of people do when out and about in a city at lunchtime: we went for a Chinese.

After lunch we were shown round the Forbidden City by a determinedly cheerful guide, who took the challenge of keeping our jetlag at bay personally.

He showed us round the palace’s many rooms, until we called a halt, begging for mercy as tiredness hit home.

As intriguing as the concubines’ quarters sounded, we told him kindly, but firmly, that all we really wanted to do was to flake out for a while.

At our hotel, my roommate and I revived with showers, naps, more Chinese food and some great evening TV.

You haven’t lived until you have seen Who wants to be a Millionaire? in Chinese, believe me.

Breakfast passed in nervous silence the next day as we contemplated the day ahead.

However, as our coach took us out of the city, our spirits rose.  Glorious countryside appeared all around us as the roads grew twistier and prettier.

We eventually arrived at the ex-army barracks at the foot of the Wall that were to be our home for the night.

From here, we walked the few yards to the start of our ‘warm-up walk’.

Laden with boots, poles, fleeces, rucksacks, hats, snacks and water bottles, we must have appeared ridiculous to local guide, Mr Liu, who skipped ahead of us in plimsolls and an old T-shirt.

This first part of the Wall was well maintained, with dozens of steps, uneven in height, and seemingly unending in amount.

As we walked through stunning scenery, I wanted to carry on and carry on, discovering what was behind each intriguing corner.

Later, the walk grew harder where the wall had eroded and we picked our way past many a rocky obstacle.

We hid from burning sunshine in turrets dotted along the way, and kept it at bay with sunhats, cream and glasses.

The walk doubled back on itself, ending where it had started. And I hadn’t collapsed once.  Just as well.

The next day’s walk would be four times as long on far rougher terrain.

Back at the barracks, flasks of hot jasmine tea waited for us, along with pretty ceramic cups.

Mind you, supper wasn’t quite so simple to come by.

We were led to a pond teeming with fish and handed fishing rods.

If we caught, we ate.

Cue a contest between the guys in our group to see who could catch the best fish.

Happily, some success cut through the machismo and eat supper we did.

Freshly-caught fish stuffed with ginger and noodles, eaten outdoors under a night sky full of stars.

Delicious.

Would You Get a Virtual Makeover?

0 Comments

It seems like you can find an application for just about anything lately…

On a night out and worried you may be too drunk to drive home? Not a problem: if you have the iPhone ‘Drink Buddy’ app, you can check to see if your within the legal limit (although if you feel the need to check, the answer is probably no).

Nervous a blind date could turn awkward? Don’t be, because there’s an app that helps you out in that situation too.

Some apps and recent technology are obviously more useful than others (with some, like the ‘Hold On’ app bordering on ridiculous…)

My latest pick, is an app which gives you a ‘virtual makeover’ to help you pick the makeup products which suit you best.

Currently, one of the most popular of ‘virtual makeover technologies,’ is Modiface, which just recently (on October 1st of this year) released a new version of their popular ‘Makeup’ iPhone application.

This app uses facial recognition technology to help users develop an improved makeup routine.

Other apps by Modiface include: ‘Instant Celebrity Makeover’ (lets you ‘try on’ the look of different celebrities), ‘Weight Mirror’ (answers the question of what you’d look like if you had actually followed through with that diet last summer), and even ‘Uglify’ (to see what you’d like if you were…well… ugly), among others.

Although I haven’t used any of these apps myself, I’m somewhat sceptical about how well they actually work.

However, there are other makeup application technologies out there, which I think sound more intriguing.

Take the interactive makeup application kiosks, created by Shiseido, for example, which can be found in the Takashimaya department store in Tokyo.

If you’re wondering how this works, it actually sounds fairly simple.

The kiosk scans a ‘before’ image of your face and then gives you tailored recommendations for the makeup products which suit you best.

You can also use the on-screen makeup palette to look for any other products which look appealing and all of your selections are recorded.

You can then generate an ‘after’ picture of a new made-up you, which allows you to see what the makeup products look like on you without actually having to put any makeup on.

Sounds great, but there’s a downside… they’re currently only available in Tokyo!

Good news is there are many others (good and bad) apps, and many of them are available online free of charge.

My favourite is Daily Makeover, not only because it was the easiest to use out of all the virtual makeover app’s I found, but it also offered the widest range of brands to try on (bare essentials, clinique and bobbi brown are just a few examples of the available brands).

Here’s my Daily Makeover before and after:

Ok… I would never actually wear this much makeup, but one of the great things about the site is it lets you play around with the types (and amount) of makeup without the hassle you’d have if you were applying it in real life. Not only this, but Daily Makeover gives you tips and product reviews… perfect for people looking for a new look.

And if you’re looking for more Halloween ideas, they offer ‘Halloween Makeup Treats,’ tips on how to find your ‘Halloween Hair,’ along with tips and links on how to do your makeup to go with your costume.

If you’re not sold on the whole digital makeover idea yet, if nothing else it’s fun- you can try on different celebrity styles, play different makeup games and quizzes (you can ‘J.Lo’ your look, for example) and read other beauty and style tips…

What are your experiences with virtual makeover technology: techniques of the future or just another gadget for your phone?